Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150983
 


 



What One Hand Giveth, the Other Taketh Away: How Future Dangerousness Corrupts Guilt Verdicts and Produces Premature Punishment Decisions in Capital Cases


Elizabeth S. Vartkessian


University at Albany - School of Criminal Justice

October 16, 2012

Pace Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2012

Abstract:     
This article aims to further the discussion of the constitutionality of the Texas capital sentencing scheme by focusing on how the statutory focus on the defendant’s future dangerousness dismantles bifurcation and encourages early sentencing decisions. Using data from the Capital Jury Project (CJP), the article demonstrates the biasing effect of early exposure to the concept of dangerousness during voir dire. It traces how jurors use the concept of the defendant’s dangerousness in their guilt decisions and it parses out the ways in which the topic facilitates early sentencing decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: capital punishment, future dangerousness, Texas, juror decision making

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Vartkessian, Elizabeth S., What One Hand Giveth, the Other Taketh Away: How Future Dangerousness Corrupts Guilt Verdicts and Produces Premature Punishment Decisions in Capital Cases (October 16, 2012). Pace Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2150983

Contact Information

Elizabeth S. Vartkessian (Contact Author)
University at Albany - School of Criminal Justice ( email )
135 Western Ave
Building, Room 109
Albany, NY 12222
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 224
Downloads: 27
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Against Proportional Punishment
By Adam Kolber

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds