Pluralism, Context and the Internal Life of Property: A Response to Hanoch Dagan
Lisa M. Austin
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law
September 26, 2012
University of Toronto Law Journal, Forthcoming
This paper is a comment on Hanoch Dagan’s claims in “Inside Property.” Despite Dagan’s desire to provide an “internal” account of property institutions that is sensitive to both pluralism and context, I argue that his denigration of doctrinal analysis robs him of important critical resources. Doctrine is part of the “inside” of law that can help us understand when legal institutions fail. In addition, by offering an alternative to Dagan’s ends-based reasoning, doctrinal analysis can provide us with a way of seeking agreement on public norms governing interaction when we have deep disagreements regarding ends. In other words, pluralists interested in critical contextual analysis of institutions have good reason to take doctrinal reasoning seriously. I illustrate my claims by using the Canadian example of Re Noble and Wolf, a Canadian case concerning discriminatory restrictive covenants.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: property theory, pluralism, formalism, servitudes, restrictive covenants, Legal RealismAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 27, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds