The Role of Auditors, Non-Auditors, and Internal Tax Departments in Corporate Tax Aggressiveness
Kenneth J. Klassen
University of Waterloo - School of Accounting and Finance
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Accountancy
University of Saskatchewan
May 22, 2013
Using confidential data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on who signs the corporate tax return, we investigate whether the party primarily responsible for preparing a corporation’s tax return — the auditor, the external non-auditor, or the internal tax department — is related to that corporation’s tax aggressiveness. We find that both internally prepared tax returns and external non-auditor-prepared tax returns claim more aggressive tax positions than returns prepared by the company’s auditors. Given that preparer type is informative of tax aggressiveness, we also evaluate the usefulness of publicly disclosed tax fees to infer these parties. In a surprising result, we show that publicly disclosed tax fees paid to a company’s auditor do not provide information sufficient to replicate our core results, and that using tax fees to classify companies according to whether their auditor provides both services yields total error rates that exceed 60 percent. Our findings are important to understanding the advisory role that external tax preparers, including auditors, play in the tax compliance choices of firms, and the extent to which inferences using tax fees can be made about these parties.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: tax preparer, auditor, tax fee, FIN 48, tax reserve, tax aggressiveness
JEL Classification: H25, M41working papers series
Date posted: September 26, 2012 ; Last revised: May 22, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.641 seconds