How NFIB v. Sebelius Affects the Constitutional Gestalt

Lawrence B. Solum

Georgetown University Law Center

June 6, 2013

91 Washington University Law Review 1 (2013)
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-152

The thesis of this essay is that the most important legal effects of the Supreme Court's decision in NFIB v. Sebelius are likely to be indirect. Sebelius marks a possible shift in what we can call the “constitutional gestalt” regarding the meaning and implications of the so-called “New Deal Settlement.” Before Sebelius, the consensus understanding was that New Deal and Warren Court cases had established a constitutional regime of plenary and virtually unlimited national legislative power under the Commerce Clause (which might be subject to narrow and limited carve outs protective of the core of state sovereignty).

After Sebelius, the constitutional gestalt is unsettled. In Sebelius, five justices of the Supreme Court endorsed a view of the commerce clause that is inconsistent with the constitutional gestalt associated with the New Deal Settlement. A fissure has opened in constitutional politics, creating space for an alternative constitutional gestalt. The core idea of the alternative view is that the New Deal Settlement did not create plenary and virtually unlimited legislative power; instead, proponents of the New Federalism argue that New Deal and Warren Court cases establish only the constitutionality of particular federal programs and specific zones of federal power. The most important indirect effect of Sebelius is that it enables constitutional contestation over the content of the constitutional gestalt and the meaning of the New Deal Settlement.

This is a revised draft and replaces the draft of October 16, 2012, which is now on file with the author.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: Constitution, Gestalt, Individual Mandate, Commerce Clause, New Deal Settlement, Originalism, Stare Decisis

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 26, 2012 ; Last revised: October 9, 2014

Suggested Citation

Solum, Lawrence B., How NFIB v. Sebelius Affects the Constitutional Gestalt (June 6, 2013). 91 Washington University Law Review 1 (2013); Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-152. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2152653 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2152653

Contact Information

Lawrence B. Solum (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,140
Downloads: 673
Download Rank: 27,282

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds