|
||||
|
||||
Brief of Amici Curiae Economics Professors in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System (U.S. Supreme Court)Bernard S. BlackNorthwestern University - School of Law; Northwestern University - Kellogg School of Management; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) David DranoveNorthwestern University - Kellogg School of Management Cory S. CappsBates White, LLC Martin S. GaynorCarnegie Mellon University; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Leverhulme Centre for Market and Public Organisation Robert J. TownUniversity of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Timothy BresnahanStanford University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) David M. CutlerHarvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Guy DavidUniversity of Pennsylvania - Health Care Systems Department Alain C. Enthovenaffiliation not provided to SSRN Gautam GowrisankaranUniversity of Arizona - Eller College of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Deborah Haas-WilsonSmith College Katherine HoColumbia University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Richard LindroothUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Anthony T. Lo SassoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago - School of Public Health Thomas G. McGuireHarvard Medical School - Department of Health Care Policy Aviv NevoNorthwestern University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Stephen L. ParenteUniversity of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Department of Health Care Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Mark V. PaulyUniversity of Pennsylvania - Health Care Systems Department; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Tomas PhilipsonUniversity of Chicago; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Uwe Reinhardtaffiliation not provided to SSRN Mark SatterthwaiteNorthwestern University - Kellogg School of Management R. Lawrence Van HornVanderbilt University - Strategy and Business Economics William WhiteCornell University Dennis YaoHarvard Business School; University of Pennsylvania - Business & Public Policy Department Jack ZwanzigerUniversity of Illinois at Chicago August 20, 2012 Health Management, Policy and Innovation, Vol. 1 (2012) Abstract: This amicus brief was filed in Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., in which the FTC has obtained review of an 11th Circuit decision that insulated a merger of two nonprofit hospitals from antitrust scrutiny. We make two arguments in the amicus brief. First, there is no compelling theoretical basis for an antitrust exemption for nonprofit hospitals. That is, economic theory provides no determinate conclusions regarding whether nonprofits will exploit market power if given the opportunity. As a consequence, whether there is an economic basis for more favorable treatment of nonprofit hospitals is an empirical matter. Second, there is a strong consensus in empirical research that, in general, nonprofit hospitals do exploit their market power by raising prices. This empirical evidence on the exercise of market power by nonprofit hospitals strongly suggests that they should not be exempt from antitrust scrutiny. Such an exemption would serve the private interests of nonprofit hospitals to the detriment of consumers and society as a whole.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 19, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.000 seconds