Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154053
 
 

Footnotes (329)



 


 



How the Supreme Court and the Department of Labor May Dispel Myths About ERISA’S Family Law Provisions and Protect the Benefit Entitlements that Arise Thereunder


Albert Feuer


Law Offices of Albert Feuer

September 28, 2012

45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2012)

Abstract:     
This Article discusses the interaction between ERISA and family law (i.e., domestic relations law and estates law). The Supreme Court and the US Department of Labor (“DOL”) may improve the practice of both ERISA and family law by dispelling myths that they have reinforced.

First, the Court incorrectly asserted that the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 (“REACT”) “enhanced protection to the spouse and dependent children in the event of divorce or separation, and in the event of death the surviving spouse.” This assertion has encouraged plan administrators and other courts to find that domestic relations orders (“DROs”) govern an excessively broad class of ERISA pension and life insurance benefits. However, REACT, like ERISA, was a reaction to the inadequacies of state law and prior federal law pertaining to domestic relations and estate law. Thus, it similarly circumscribed the role of state law and increased substantive protections for ERISA participants and beneficiaries.

Second, the Court added a gloss to ERISA in non-family law contexts that emphasizes the importance of limiting the cost burdens imposed on employers by ERISA, which, if excessive, would discourage employers from establishing and maintaining employee benefit plans. This gloss has encouraged other courts to lose sight of the leitmotif of ERISA, protecting plan benefits of participants and beneficiaries. Thus, courts have wrongfully permitted individuals to use superseded (state family law or federal common law) ownership claims to obtain benefit entitlements from the recipients of those entitlements rather than the plans. Such holdings violate Supreme Court decisions extending over more than a hundred years, which consistently protected ERISA entitlements and other federal entitlements, before and after their distribution.

The DOL has created issues by both its actions and inactions. First, the DOL incorrectly asserted that the ERISA benefit claim provisions should not govern plan reviews of DRO for compliance with the pertinent ERISA requirements, the qualified domestic relations order (“QDRO”) requirements, but has failed to present an alternative set of review provisions for plans to follow. This has created unnecessary issues concerning the roles of plan administrators, participants, their families, and courts in such reviews Second, the DOL has provided only nonbinding, informal guidance to the general public rather than extensive DOL regulations with respect the QDRO requirements. This has created unnecessary issues for persons seeking to prepare a DRO that complies with the pertinent ERISA requirements, and for plan administrators responding to such requests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 132

Keywords: ERISA, QDRO, domestic relations, estates, beneficiary, alimony, spousal, divorce, REACT, pension, life insurance

JEL Classification: H89, J32, J33, K31, K34, K49, M52, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 29, 2012 ; Last revised: October 6, 2012

Suggested Citation

Feuer, Albert, How the Supreme Court and the Department of Labor May Dispel Myths About ERISA’S Family Law Provisions and Protect the Benefit Entitlements that Arise Thereunder (September 28, 2012). 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 635 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154053

Contact Information

Albert Feuer (Contact Author)
Law Offices of Albert Feuer ( email )
Suite 7M
110-45 71st Road
Forest Hills, NY 11375
United States
718-263-9874 (Phone)
718-575-0006 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 728
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 165,691
Footnotes:  329

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds