|
||||
|
||||
The Problem of Resource AccessLee Anne FennellUniversity of Chicago Law School September 26, 2012 Harvard Law Review, Vol. 126, 2013 University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 616 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 404 Abstract: The Coasean insight that transaction costs stand between the world as we know it and an ideal of perfect efficiency has provided generations of law and economics scholars with an analytic north star. But for legal scholars interested in the efficiency implications of property arrangements, transaction costs turn out to constitute an unhelpful category. Transaction costs are related to property rights in unstable and contested ways, and they comprise a heterogeneous set of impediments, not all of which are amenable to cost-effective reduction through law. Treating them as focal confuses the cause of our difficulties in structuring access to resources (positive transaction costs) with the solution to the problem presented by a world featuring scarce resources and positive transaction costs. A broader notion of resource access costs, appropriately subdivided, can correct problems of overinclusion, underinclusion, and insufficient specification in the transaction cost concept. The resulting analytic clarity will allow property theorists to contribute more usefully to solving resource problems. Note: This paper previously circulated under the title "Resource Access Costs"
Number of Pages in PDF File: 58 Keywords: Coase Theorem, Demsetz, entitlements, property rights, resources, transaction costs Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 30, 2012 ; Last revised: March 10, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.828 seconds