Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154604
 


 



Three Frank Questions to Discipline Your Theorizing


Daniel B. Klein


George Mason University - Department of Economics

April 28, 2013

GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 12-44

Abstract:     
Social science fledglings can improve their theorizing by focusing on three questions: Theory of what?, Why should we care?, and What merit in your explanation? This suite of questions takes the spine of theory to be explanation. Explanation has a counterpart in the thing to be explained, the explanandum. The three questions have been deployed in criticizing the tendency in economics to pass off mere model-building as theorizing. I summarize that deployment and then offer the three questions as means to discipline one’s theorizing. Adam Smith helps us see the theorizer as something of an artist. The questions help us appreciate a work by James Coleman and Thomas Hoffer. I also use a coauthored work of my own to explore the questions and relate them to creativity in theorizing (“abduction”).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: theory, theorizing, explanation, explanandum, understanding

JEL Classification: B40, B49, Y8

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 30, 2012 ; Last revised: April 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Klein, Daniel B., Three Frank Questions to Discipline Your Theorizing (April 28, 2013). GMU Working Paper in Economics No. 12-44. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154604 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2154604

Contact Information

Daniel B. Klein (Contact Author)
George Mason University - Department of Economics ( email )
4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,250
Downloads: 486
Download Rank: 31,658

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds