Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2155207
 


 



Originalist Ideology and the Rule of Law


Ian C. Bartrum


University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

September 12, 2012

Journal of Constitutional Law Heightened Scrutiny, Vol. 15, 2012
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series

Abstract:     
This essay contends that one of the basic tenets of the "New Originalism" -- the so-called "contribution thesis" -- compromises our underlying commitment to the rule of law. By locating some binding substantive content of constitutional language in a historical record beyond the text itself, originalism undermines the fundamental concepts of formal legality and public accessibility. With these issues in mind, the essay concludes that originalism is not a philosophical account of how the Constitution has meaning in our legal system, but is instead a judicial ideology intended to promote the constitutional policy judgments of an earlier generation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Originalism, Rule of Law, Contribution Thesis, Solum, Whittington, Barnett, Tamanaha, Sean Wilson

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 1, 2012 ; Last revised: April 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bartrum, Ian C., Originalist Ideology and the Rule of Law (September 12, 2012). Journal of Constitutional Law Heightened Scrutiny, Vol. 15, 2012; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2155207

Contact Information

Ian C. Bartrum (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )
4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,246
Downloads: 179
Download Rank: 93,826

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.516 seconds