|
||||
|
||||
Pliva v. Mensing: Generic Consumers' Unfortunate HandStacey B. LeeJohns Hopkins University - Carey Business School 2012 Yake Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. XII, No. 209, 2012 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court held in PLIVA v. Mensing that federal preemption immunizes generic drug manufacturers from liability for state law failure-to-warn claims. As a result, consumers harmed by a mislabeled generic drug will be unable to bring actions against generic manufacturers under state law. The Court confessed that the resulting federal drug-labeling scheme dealt consumers an “unfortunate hand.” By removing generic manufacturers’ duty to improve the adequacy of their products’ warning labels, the Supreme Court calls into question the safety of generic drugs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 1, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds