Abstract

 


 



Making Continuous Disclosure Work – Outcomes v. Enforcement


Andrew Lumsden


Corrs Chambers Westgarth

October 2, 2012

JASSA, Spring 2002

Abstract:     
The current co-regulatory model for supervising Australia’s public companies is working well. The proposal that ASIC be given the power to issue fines for failures of listed entities to comply with the continuous disclosure requirements is unlikely to make a material contribution to improving disclosure in the market. Rather than “bracing” one leg of a two legged stool perhaps we’d be better served by creating a third leg. A new Disclosure Division established as a division of the successful Takeovers Panel would be better able to enforce and promote the continuous disclosure regime.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: disclosure, corporations act, ASIC, Australia

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Lumsden, Andrew J., Making Continuous Disclosure Work – Outcomes v. Enforcement (October 2, 2012). JASSA, Spring 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156034

Contact Information

Andrew J. Lumsden (Contact Author)
Corrs Chambers Westgarth ( email )
Governor Phillip Tower
1 Farrer Place
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 87
Downloads: 19

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.296 seconds