Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156368
 


 



Toxic Torts and Causation: The Challenge of Daubert after the First Decade


Jean M. Eggen


Widener University - Delaware Law School

2003

Natural Resources and Environment, Vol. 17, 2003

Abstract:     
This article looks back on the first decade following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The test set forth by the Court for the admissibility of scientific evidence acquired by the scientific method, and its subsequent extension and explanation of the test in General Electric Co. v. Joiner and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, have exerted significant substantive influence over certain areas of the law, including toxic torts. Because toxic tort plaintiffs rely heavily on expert scientific testimony to prove causation, the evidentiary standards applied to admissibility of that evidence may make or break a case. Over the first ten years, Daubert has generated more complex questions in toxic torts than the doctrine has answered. This article explores some of those questions, with particular emphasis on the treatment of novel scientific methodologies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: toxic torts, scientific evidence, Daubert

JEL Classification: K13


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 4, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Eggen, Jean M., Toxic Torts and Causation: The Challenge of Daubert after the First Decade (2003). Natural Resources and Environment, Vol. 17, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156368

Contact Information

Jean Macchiaroli Eggen (Contact Author)
Widener University - Delaware Law School ( email )
4601 Concord Pike
Wilmington, DE 19803-0406
United States
(302) 477-2155 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 260
Downloads: 34

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.187 seconds