Toxic Torts and Causation: The Challenge of Daubert after the First Decade

Jean M. Eggen

Widener University - Delaware Campus


Natural Resources and Environment, Vol. 17, 2003

This article looks back on the first decade following the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The test set forth by the Court for the admissibility of scientific evidence acquired by the scientific method, and its subsequent extension and explanation of the test in General Electric Co. v. Joiner and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, have exerted significant substantive influence over certain areas of the law, including toxic torts. Because toxic tort plaintiffs rely heavily on expert scientific testimony to prove causation, the evidentiary standards applied to admissibility of that evidence may make or break a case. Over the first ten years, Daubert has generated more complex questions in toxic torts than the doctrine has answered. This article explores some of those questions, with particular emphasis on the treatment of novel scientific methodologies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: toxic torts, scientific evidence, Daubert

JEL Classification: K13

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 4, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Eggen, Jean M., Toxic Torts and Causation: The Challenge of Daubert after the First Decade (2003). Natural Resources and Environment, Vol. 17, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156368

Contact Information

Jean Macchiaroli Eggen (Contact Author)
Widener University - Delaware Campus ( email )
PO Box 7474
Wilmington, DE 19803
United States
(302) 477-2155 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 256
Downloads: 34

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds