Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156842
 
 

Footnotes (91)



 


 



Realism Over Formalism and the Presumption of Constitutionality: Chief Justice Roberts’ Opinion Upholding the Individual Mandate


Wilson Ray Huhn


University of Akron - School of Law

October 4, 2012

46 Akron Law Review 117, 2013
U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-18

Abstract:     
In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote to uphold the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Speaking for the Court in Part III-C of his opinion, Roberts found that the individual mandate was properly enacted pursuant to the General Welfare Clause. Two aspects of his opinion in particular drove this result. In deciding whether the individual mandate constitutes a “tax” within the meaning of the Constitution, the Chief Justice engaged in realistic analysis rather than legal formalism. In addition, Roberts reasoned that, if fairly possible, the statute had to be construed in such a way as to render it constitutional. The confluence of realist analysis and the presumption of constitutionality resulted in a decision ruling that the Court should uphold the individual mandate as a proper exercise of Congress’s power to tax.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: general welfare clause, affordable care act, constitutional avoidance, presumption of constitutionality

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2012 ; Last revised: June 28, 2013

Suggested Citation

Huhn, Wilson Ray, Realism Over Formalism and the Presumption of Constitutionality: Chief Justice Roberts’ Opinion Upholding the Individual Mandate (October 4, 2012). 46 Akron Law Review 117, 2013; U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156842

Contact Information

Wilson Ray Huhn (Contact Author)
University of Akron - School of Law ( email )
150 University Ave.
Akron, OH 44325-2901
United States
330-972-6791 (Phone)
330-258-2343 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 316
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 221,670
Footnotes:  91
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. How NFIB v. Sebelius Affects the Constitutional Gestalt
By Lawrence Solum

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.469 seconds