Victor's Justice: The Next Best Moral Theory of Criminal Punishment?
Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto
October 4, 2012
Law and Philosophy, Forthcoming
Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 32/2012
In this essay, I address one methodological aspect of Victor Tadros's The Ends of Harm - namely, the moral character of the theory of criminal punishment it defends. First, I offer a brief reconstruction of this dimension of the argument, highlighting some of its distinctive strengths while drawing attention to particular inconsistencies. I then argue that Tadros ought to refrain from developing this approach in terms of an overly narrow understanding of the morality of harming as fully unified and reconciled under the lone heading of justice. In a final and most critical section, I offer arguments for why this reconciliatory commitment, further constrained by a misplaced emphasis on corrective justice, generates major problems for his general deterrence account of the core justification of criminal punishment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: moral justification of punishment, state punishment, criminal law, justice, corrective justice, general deterrence, incommensurabilityworking papers series
Date posted: October 5, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.500 seconds