Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



The Supreme Court and Gender-Neutral Language: Splitting La Difference


Judith D. Fischer


University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

October 5, 2012

Women's Rights Law Reporter, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Following the first term with three women on the United States Supreme Court, this article analyzes the extent to which the justices used gender-neutral language. The article presents background about the meaning, history, and importance of gender-neutral language. It then examines both biased and gender-neutral phrasing in the justices’ opinions for the 2010 term. It concludes that some justices, with Justice Ginsburg in the forefront, frequently use gender-neutral language, others use it some of the time, and still others, especially Justice Scalia, seldom use it. The article presents unobtrusive ways to avoid biased language and suggests that the justices, as leaders in the legal profession, could easily apply them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Women justices, supreme court, gender-neutral language, gender bias, masculine pronouns, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Alito, Breyer, Kennedy, Thomas, Kagan, Roberts, Scalia

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 6, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Fischer, Judith D., The Supreme Court and Gender-Neutral Language: Splitting La Difference (October 5, 2012). Women's Rights Law Reporter, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2157581

Contact Information

Judith D. Fischer (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 483
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 191,573
Footnotes:  80

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.484 seconds