Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2157676
 
 

Footnotes (130)



 


 



The Failed Promise of a General Theory of Pure Economic Loss: An Accident of History?


Anthony J. Sebok


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

October 5, 2012

DePaul Law Review, Vol. 61, 2012
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 376

Abstract:     
This article was prepared for the 2012 Clifford Symposium, which was held in of the career of Robert Rabin. The article reviews Rabin’s efforts to analyze and rationalize American tort doctrine concerning negligently caused economic loss, which is sometimes dubbed “pure” negligent economic loss so as to distinguish it from economic loss resulting from injury to the plaintiff’s person or property. The article praises and criticizes Rabin’s efforts. It notes that in his early writings on negligently caused economic loss Rabin celebrated decisions such as J’Aire Corp. v. Gregory because it was based on a theory of duty that drawn from a general theory of negligence that applied with equal force to other parts of negligence law, ranging from personal injury to emotional distress. The article then observes that in his later writings, Rabin seemed to back off from his optimistic claim that negligently caused economic loss can be subsumed under a general theory of duty and argued instead that courts must resort to ad hoc duty rules, thus leaving plaintiffs facing a patchwork of holdings driven by various policy considerations.

The article concludes by asking whether Rabin’s retreat is a reflection of an unavoidable reality, which is that negligently caused economic loss is, for whatever reason, destined to operate under principles that limit liability on the basis of principles and/or interests that are unmoored from tort law itself, or whether, as courts outside the United States have suggested (especially in Australia), there is a set of principles available which could subsume negligently caused economic loss cases within a broader theory of duty that includes personal injury, property damage, and emotional distress.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Torts, negligence, pure economic loss, litigation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 7, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Sebok, Anthony J., The Failed Promise of a General Theory of Pure Economic Loss: An Accident of History? (October 5, 2012). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 61, 2012; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 376. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2157676

Contact Information

Anthony J. Sebok (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 326
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 149,074
Footnotes:  130
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Is the Role of Tort to Repair Wrongful Losses?
By Gregory Keating

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds