What is Jeopardy?
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Trial Magazine (December 2012)
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 214
This article analyzes the 2012 case of Blueford v. Arkansas. Blueford was tried for murder for allegedly shaking his girlfriend’s baby to death. He claimed that it was an accident. He was tried for capital murder (death penalty waived), first degree murder, manslaughter and negligent homicide. The jury was told to consider the charges in order of seriousness, beginning with capital murder, and not moving on to first degree murder until it had reached a conclusion on capital murder, etc. After a time the jury announced that it could not reach a verdict. The judge asked the status of the case and the foreman announced that they had unanimously agreed that it was not capital murder or first degree murder but were hung 9-3 for conviction on manslaughter. After further consideration they were still hung and the judge declared a mistrial under “manifest necessity” without further discussing the status of the negotiations. The Court held that it was OK to retry Blueford for capital and first degree murder because, despite the foreman’s announcement, there had been no final resolution of those charges.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: Double jeopardy, Manifest necessityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 9, 2012 ; Last revised: July 12, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds