Rehnquist and Panvasive Searches
Vanderbilt University - Law School
October 8, 2012
Mississippi Law Journal, 2012
Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 12-36
Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-29
In the history of the Supreme Court, William Rehnquist may have been the least friendly justice toward the view that the Fourth Amendment should be read expansively. Even he, however, might have interpreted the amendment to place more restrictions on modern law enforcement techniques than current caselaw does. Relying on a 1974 article authored by Rehnquist, this essay, written for a symposium on Rehnquist and the Fourth Amendment, describes his views on the types of requirements the Fourth Amendment imposes on the police, how decriminalization can protect privacy, and most importantly, why Rehnquist might have been willing to regulate surveillance that is “panvasive” — pervasive and widespread — even if it focuses on public activities or information surrendered to third parties.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Rehnquist, Fourth Amendment, surveillance, Jones
Date posted: October 9, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.453 seconds