Abstract

 


 



The Risk Parity Approach to Asset Allocation - Climbing the Wall of Worries?


Fabian Dori


1741 Asset Management Ltd.; University of St. Gallen

Frank Haeusler


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Manuel Krieger


Independent

Urs Schubiger


Independent

David Stefanovits


affiliation not provided to SSRN

September 2012

1741 Asset Management, Research Note Series 3/2012

Abstract:     
The risk parity asset allocation methodology has recently increased in popularity, as such strategies have in general avoided the hefty drawdowns during the recent volatile market periods. Even the most fervent critics appreciate the diversifying potential historically provided by risk parity concepts. However, they point out that the tide may be turning. It is often stated that the past merits of the strategy may be its future challenges. Concerns raised relate to issues like: While being of inestimable value during the subprime crisis, isn’t it overly risky to be considerably exposed to government bonds in light of uncomfortably high sovereign debt? Having successfully exploited dynamic correlation relationships in the past, can the concept still provide a diversified portfolio even with the virtual outage of fixed income instruments as a source of return because of record low yields? In spite of facilitating the equalisation of risk contributions, does the leverage usually employed not expose the portfolio to heightened tail risks? The responses brought forward to these legitimate criticisms, are as diverse as the group of discussants is numerous. The objective of this note is, therefore, to contribute to the discussion by taking a general point of view. What can be inferred from empirical evidence in order to judge the future attractiveness of the risk parity concept relative to alternative asset allocation strategies in general? And how does the concept compare with respect to the specific concerns highlighted above? In order to answer these questions, we contrast three different yet popular allocation styles, namely a traditional balanced strategy, the minimum variance concept and the risk parity methodology. The results suggest that while the current criticism has its warrants, empirical evidence points towards the expectation that risk parity strategies may further climb up the wall of worries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Asset Allocation, Portfolio Construction, Risk Parity, Minimum Variance

JEL Classification: G10, G11, G15

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dori, Fabian, Haeusler, Frank, Krieger, Manuel, Schubiger, Urs and Stefanovits, David, The Risk Parity Approach to Asset Allocation - Climbing the Wall of Worries? (September 2012). 1741 Asset Management, Research Note Series 3/2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2159283 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159283

Contact Information

Fabian Dori (Contact Author)
1741 Asset Management Ltd. ( email )
Münsterhof 5
Zürich, 8001
Switzerland
+41442184132 (Phone)
University of Saint Gallen
Switzerland
Frank Haeusler
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Manuel Krieger
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Urs Schubiger
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
David Stefanovits
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,255
Downloads: 438
Download Rank: 30,284

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds