Immigration Enforcement and the Fugitive Slave Acts: Exploring Their Similarities

Karla Mari McKanders

University of Tennessee College of Law

October 9, 2012

Catholic Law Review, Vol. 61.4, No. 1, 2012, Forthcoming
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 201

Two seemingly different federal enforcement systems that affect the movement of unskilled workers — the 1793 and 1850 Fugitive Slave Acts and current state immigration enforcement policies — have remarkable similarities. Both systems are political stories that are demonstrative of the failure of federalism. The federal government’s current failure to enforce immigration laws has encouraged state and local governments to pass their own laws. Alabama and Arizona have enacted far-reaching laws, which are similar to the federal Immigration and Nationality Act § 287(g) programs. Both have been challenged on constitutional preemption and equal protection grounds. Recent scholarship has focused mainly on whether the state and local actions are constitutionally preempted. Current scholarship has overlooked ways the federal government has previously utilized state and local entities to enforce federal laws that govern individual rights. To date, legal scholars have not engaged in this comparison. This article challenges the notion of the Fugitive Slave Acts’ irrelevance in this context by examining in detail the similarities of both systems and the results that are produced when the federal government is provided with unfettered discretion to abrogate individual rights.

The article proceeds in three parts. Part I provides an overview of the implementation and enforcement of the Constitution’s Fugitive Slave Clause and the 1793 and 1850 Fugitive Slave Acts. This Part also explores the implementation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and the evisceration of the Fugitive Slave Acts when subsequent immigration laws refused to recognize equal protection rights for immigrants. Part II explores the reverse immigration-federalism story in which states and localities are enacting immigration legislation against the backdrop of federal inaction. Part III explores how both the Fugitive Slave Acts and current immigration enforcement laws create outsiders by failing to protect individual liberty rights. The article concludes with broad doctrinal lessons on immigration federalism and demonstrates how the law and legal actors can perpetuate norms that facilitate the creation of tiered personhood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: immigration, fugitive slave act, equal protection, immigration enforcement

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 9, 2012 ; Last revised: October 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

McKanders, Karla Mari, Immigration Enforcement and the Fugitive Slave Acts: Exploring Their Similarities (October 9, 2012). Catholic Law Review, Vol. 61.4, No. 1, 2012, Forthcoming; University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 201. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2159467

Contact Information

Karla Mari McKanders (Contact Author)
University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )
1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States
(865) 974-5710 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utk.edu/faculty/mckanders/index.shtml

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 725
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 204,578
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Information for Submitting Articles to Law Reviews & Journals
By Allen Rostron and Nancy Levit

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds