Separation and Dependence: Explaining Modern Corporate Governance

14 Pages Posted: 10 Oct 2012

Date Written: October 10, 2012

Abstract

I use the occasion of my inaugural Wiley lecture to set forth my understanding of corporate governance.

I will refer to my model of corporate governance as the “horizontal model” of corporate governance, because my central argument is that the key aspects of corporate governance – which I identify as officers, directors, and shareholders – have a shared role in exercising corporate power.

Each has a piece of the overall quantity of corporate power, but none alone can take significant corporate action independently. That is, each of the players in corporate governance has an incomplete piece of corporate power. In this way power is separated, and also codependent.

This is a conception of corporate governance that is in harmony with much of the existing academic literature. For example, in expressly rejecting the notion of shareholders as owners entitled as a matter of course to control the firm, I am adopting a contractual view of the corporation, which conceives of shareholders as one of many claimants in a firm.

On the other hand, I reject not only the shareholder supremacy model of the corporation, but also the director primary and officer primacy versions as well. While I acknowledge the importance of each, and do concede a central role to officers, unlike most, I ultimately describe each as equivalent parts of corporate governance.

Keywords: Corporate governance, director primacy, shareholder primacy, Delaware, board of directors, corporate law

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Lubben, Stephen J., Separation and Dependence: Explaining Modern Corporate Governance (October 10, 2012). Seton Hall Law Review, Forthcoming, Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2159896

Stephen J. Lubben (Contact Author)

Seton Hall Law School ( email )

One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
973-642-8857 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
168
Abstract Views
2,302
Rank
320,710
PlumX Metrics