|
||||
|
||||
A Constitutional and Empirical Analysis of Iowa's Administrative Rules Review Committee ProcedureJerry L. AndersonDrake University Law School Christopher PoynorDrake University Law School October 11, 2012 Drake Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2013 Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-26 Abstract: Iowa gives a joint legislative committee, called the Administrative Rules Review Committee, significant power over agency rulemaking. The ARRC can delay a rule, either for a 70-day period, or until the end of the next legislative session. It can also object to a rule, which switches the burden of proof to the agency in any future judicial challenge and makes the agency liable for the litigation costs of successful challengers. In this article, the authors study 15 years of committee activity to determine how the ARRC has used its authority and to assess the degree of legislative intrusion on executive administration. The data indicate that the ARRC has used its authority most often against environmental rules and that the impact of the review process extends beyond the formal actions taken by the committee. The article subjects the ARRC procedure to a separation of powers analysis and concludes that the objection and delay authority exceed the permissible boundaries of legislative power.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74 Keywords: separation of powers, legislative veto, administrative rulemaking JEL Classification: K23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 11, 2012 ; Last revised: October 13, 2012Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.484 seconds