Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2161037
 
 

Footnotes (92)



 


 



Not a Free Press Court?


Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky


University of Florida - Levin College of Law

October 12, 2012

Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
The last decade has been tumultuous for print and broadcast media. Daily newspaper circulation continues to fall precipitously, magazines struggle to survive, and network television audiences keep shrinking. In the meanwhile, cable news is prospering, mobile devices are contributing to increased news consumption, and many new media outlets appear to be thriving. Despite the dynamism in the media industry, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts has taken up relatively few First Amendment cases directly involving the media. The Court has addressed a number of important free speech cases since 2005, but thus far the only Roberts Court decisions directly involving the traditional media are the two decisions in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, both of which avoided the looming First Amendment issue they contained, and the only decision involving new media is Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n. This essay, taking its cue from Erwin Chemerinsky’s recent lecture, Not a Free Speech Court, attempts to read the jurisprudential tea leaves to determine what lines of argument the media might use and how they might fare in future cases before the Roberts Court. Though the evidence is scanty, the Roberts Court appears committed to protecting unpopular speech, limiting the spread of “medium-specific” First Amendment doctrines to new media, and broadly defining speech of public concern. As far as the media are concerned, however, this good news may be overshadowed by the bad. Not only has the Court sidestepped two opportunities to free broadcast media from the FCC’s content-based regulatory oversight, but, what is worse, the Court appears to see the “Fourth Estate” as little more than a slogan media corporations bandy about to further their selfish interests. In light of these observations, perhaps the media should be grateful that the Roberts Court has addressed few cases directly involving them and should hope the trend continues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: First Amendment, media law, press, new media, social media, citizens united, indecency, constitutional law, public concern

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2012 ; Last revised: November 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Not a Free Press Court? (October 12, 2012). Brigham Young University Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2161037

Contact Information

Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352.392.2211 (Phone)
352.392.3005 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 726
Downloads: 87
Download Rank: 166,127
Footnotes:  92
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Is Data Speech?
By Jane Bambauer

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.485 seconds