Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (74)



 


 



The Contraception Mandate


Caroline Mala Corbin


University of Miami School of Law

October 15, 2012

Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 107, p. 151, 2012

Abstract:     
Under the new health care regime, health insurance plans must cover contraception. While religious employers are exempt from this requirement, religiously affiliated employers are not. Several have sued, claiming that the “contraception mandate” violates the Free Exercise Clause, the Free Speech Clause, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. This essay explains why the contraception mandate violates none of them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: contraception, birth control, ACA, contraception mandate, health insurance, health care, free exercise, free speech, associations, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, women, discrimination, Catholic Bishops

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2012 ; Last revised: December 17, 2012

Suggested Citation

Corbin, Caroline Mala, The Contraception Mandate (October 15, 2012). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 107, p. 151, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2162080

Contact Information

Caroline Mala Corbin (Contact Author)
University of Miami School of Law ( email )
1311 Miller Drive
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 895
Downloads: 256
Download Rank: 57,713
Footnotes:  74

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds