Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2162755
 


 



How Folk Beliefs about Free Will Influence Sentencing: A New Target for the Neuro-Determinist Critics of Criminal Law


Emad Hanzala Atiq


Yale University, Law School

October 17, 2012

16(3) New Criminal Law Review 449 (2013)
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper

Abstract:     
Do recent results in neuroscience and psychology, that portray our choices as predetermined, threaten to undermine the assumptions about “free will” that drive criminal law? This Article answers in the affirmative, and offers a novel argument for the transformative import of modern science. It also explains why a revision in the law’s assumptions is morally desirable. Problematic assumptions about free will have a role to play in criminal law not because they underlie substantive legal doctrine or retributive theory, but because everyday actors in the sentencing process are authorized to make irreducibly moral determinations outside of the ordinary doctrinal framework. Jurors, judges, and legislators are each required, at key points in the sentencing process, to make moral judgments that cannot be reached without reference to the person’s own understanding of free will. As a result, sentencing actors give legal effect to widely-held folk beliefs about free will, beliefs that the evidence suggests are both scientifically suspect and morally distorting. The relevant beliefs make adjudicators less likely to attend to the underlying causes of crime, such as social deprivation – a tendency that biases adjudicators against relevant arguments for mitigation in sentencing. Modern science could have an important corrective effect in this context.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Free Will, Criminal Responsibility, Determinism, Neuroscience, Mitigation

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2012 ; Last revised: July 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Atiq, Emad Hanzala, How Folk Beliefs about Free Will Influence Sentencing: A New Target for the Neuro-Determinist Critics of Criminal Law (October 17, 2012). 16(3) New Criminal Law Review 449 (2013) ; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2162755

Contact Information

Emad Hanzala Atiq (Contact Author)
Yale University, Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,224
Downloads: 424
Download Rank: 37,506

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.360 seconds