Footnotes (51)



Can the CEO Learn from the Condemned? The Application of Capital Mitigation Strategies to White Collar Cases

Todd Haugh

Indiana University - Kelley School of Business

October 10, 2012

American University Law Review, Vol. 62, 2012
Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2012-10

Ted Kaczynski and Bernie Madoff share much in common. Both are well-educated, extremely intelligent, charismatic figures. Both rose to the height of their chosen professions — mathematics and finance. And both will die in federal prison, Kaczynski for committing a twenty-year mail-bombing spree that killed three people and seriously injured dozens more, and Madoff for committing the largest Ponzi scheme in history, bilking thousands of people out of almost $65 billion. But that last similarity — Kaczynski’s and Madoff’s plight at sentencing — may not have had to be. While Kaczynski’s attorneys tirelessly investigated and argued every aspect of their client’s personal history, mental state, motivations, and sentencing options, Madoff’s attorneys offered almost nothing to mitigate his conduct, simply accepting his fate at sentencing. In the end, Kaczynski’s attorneys were able to convince the government, the court, and their client that a life sentence was appropriate despite that he committed one of the most heinous and well-publicized death penalty-eligible crimes in recent history. Madoff, on the other hand, with almost unlimited resources at his disposal, received effectively the same sentence — 150 years in prison — for a nonviolent economic offense. Why were these two ultimately given the same sentence? And what can Madoff, the financier with unimaginable wealth, learn from Kaczynski, the reclusive and remorseless killer, when it comes to federal sentencing?

The answer lies in how attorneys use sentencing mitigation strategies. This Article contends that federal white collar defendants have failed to effectively use mitigation strategies to lessen their sentences, resulting in unnecessarily long prison terms for nonviolent offenders committing financial crimes. The white collar defense bar has inexplicably ignored the mitigation techniques perfected by capital defense attorneys, and in the process has failed to effectively represent its clients. After discussing the development of the mitigation function in capital cases and paralleling it with the evolution of white collar sentencing jurisprudence, particularly post-Booker, this article will present seven key mitigation strategies currently used by capital defense teams and discuss how these strategies might be employed in federal white collar cases. The goal throughout this Article will be to highlight new strategies and techniques available in defending white collar clients and to enhance sentencing advocacy in federal criminal cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: capital mitigation, mitigation strategy, federal sentencing, white collar, defense, criminal

JEL Classification: K14, K19, K40, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2012 ; Last revised: September 18, 2014

Suggested Citation

Haugh, Todd, Can the CEO Learn from the Condemned? The Application of Capital Mitigation Strategies to White Collar Cases (October 10, 2012). American University Law Review, Vol. 62, 2012; Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2012-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2163644

Contact Information

Todd Haugh (Contact Author)
Indiana University - Kelley School of Business ( email )
1309 East Tenth Street
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 962
Downloads: 216
Download Rank: 101,472
Footnotes:  51
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Contract Theory and the Failures of Public-Private Contracting
By Wendy Epstein

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.469 seconds