Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2163747
 
 

Footnotes (6)



 


 



Was Afrikan Spir a Phenomenalist (and What Difference Does It Make for Understanding Nietzsche)?


Michael Steven Green


William & Mary Law School

October 18, 2012

Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Vol. 44, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
I have argued that Nietzsche was influenced by Afrikan Spir’s falsification thesis, according to which all our empirical judgments are false because they attempt to impose the necessity, unity, and timelessness of thought upon the contingency, plurality, and successiveness of sensations. My reading has been challenged by Nadeem Hussain, who argues that it ignores Spir’s phenomenalism.

According to Hussain, Spir argued that our empirical judgments are false because they treat our sensations as something that they are not (namely material objects). Since truthful judgments about sensations themselves are possible, there is nothing about sensation that is incompatible with thought. I argue that Hussain arrived at his reading by concentrating upon the first book of Spir’s major work, Denken und Wirklichkeit, before Spir presented his argument for falsificationism. When the rest of Spir’s book is considered, it is clear that Spir argues that even sensations themselves cannot be thought without falsity.

I then consider how we should understand those passages, emphasized by Hussain, in which Spir claims that our empirical judgments can have a certain conformity to our sensations. I conclude that Hussain has identified an important element of Spir’s thought, although it is one that is not only compatible with my interpretation of Spir, but supports it.

Finally, I briefly discuss the consequences for understanding Nietzsche. Here I repeat my argument that the antinaturalist theory of cognition that Nietzsche inherited from Spir made his epistemological position unstable and at times forced him into a form of global noncognitivism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Nietzsche, Afrikan Spir, Nadeem Hussain, phenomenalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2012 ; Last revised: February 21, 2013

Suggested Citation

Green, Michael Steven, Was Afrikan Spir a Phenomenalist (and What Difference Does It Make for Understanding Nietzsche)? (October 18, 2012). Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Vol. 44, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2163747

Contact Information

Michael Steven Green (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
(757) 221-7746 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,089
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 164,628
Footnotes:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.609 seconds