Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2163769
 
 

References (78)



 
 

Footnotes (12)



 


 



The Exaggerated Life of Death Panels? The Limited but Real Influence of Elite Rhetoric in the 2009-2012 Health Care Debate


Daniel J. Hopkins


University of Pennsylvania

August 13, 2016


Abstract:     
Experiments demonstrate that elite rhetoric can influence public opinion through framing and related processes. Yet outside laboratories or surveys, real-world constraints might limit elites' ability to reshape public opinion. The 2009-12 health care debate provides an opportunity to observe the interplay of elite rhetoric and public opinion. To do so, this paper couples automated content analyses with population-based survey data from thousands of Americans. Multiple empirical tests uncover limited but real evidence of framing effects. The language Americans use to explain their opinions proves generally stable, although there is also evidence that the public adopts the language of both parties' elites in a roughly symmetric fashion. Elite rhetoric does not appear to have strong effects on Americans' overall evaluations of health care reform, but it can influence the reasons they use to justify their evaluations. Methodologically, the automated analysis of elite rhetoric and open-ended survey questions shows considerable promise in illuminating elite-mass interactions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: Issue framing, public opinion, automated content analysis, health care attitudes


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 19, 2012 ; Last revised: August 14, 2016

Suggested Citation

Hopkins, Daniel J., The Exaggerated Life of Death Panels? The Limited but Real Influence of Elite Rhetoric in the 2009-2012 Health Care Debate (August 13, 2016). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2163769 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2163769

Contact Information

Daniel J. Hopkins (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania ( email )
Stiteler Hall
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.danhopkins.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,125
Downloads: 384
Download Rank: 55,945
References:  78
Footnotes:  12

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds