|
||||
|
||||
Can Analysts Assess Fundamental Risk and Valuation Uncertainty? An Empirical Analysis of Scenario-Based Value EstimatesPeter R. JoosMorgan Stanley Joseph D. PiotroskiStanford University - Graduate School of Business Suraj SrinivasanHarvard Business School September 19, 2012 Abstract: We use a dataset of sell-side analysts' scenario-based valuation estimates to examine whether analysts reliably assess the risk surrounding a firm’s fundamental value. We find that the spread in analysts’ state-contingent valuations captures the riskiness of operations and predicts the absolute magnitude of future long-run valuation errors and changes in firm fundamentals. Similarly, asymmetry embedded in the analysts’ scenario-based valuations conveys information about asymmetric risk-reward exposure and predicts skewness in future long-run valuation errors; however, embedded asymmetry is not correlated with changes in fundamentals. The results confirm that analysts’ valuations reflect both state-contingent risk assessments and non-fundamental factors.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 Keywords: Valuation, Analyst Forecasts, Scenarios, Uncertainty JEL Classification: G13, G24, G30, M41 working papers seriesDate posted: October 20, 2012 ; Last revised: November 29, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.593 seconds