Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2164556
 
 

Footnotes (271)



 


 



Structural Overdelegation in Criminal Procedure


Anthony O'Rourke


SUNY Buffalo Law School

2013

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, 2013
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-016

Abstract:     
In function, if not in form, criminal procedure is a type of delegation. It requires courts to select constitutional objectives, and to decide how much discretionary authority to allocate to law enforcement officials in order to implement those objectives. By recognizing this process for what it is, this Article identifies a previously unseen phenomenon that inheres in the structure of criminal procedure decision-making.

Criminal procedure’s decision-making structure, this Article argues, pressures the Supreme Court to delegate more discretionary authority to law enforcement officials than the Court’s constitutional objectives can justify. By definition, this systematic “overdelegation” does not result from the Supreme Court’s hostility to protecting criminal procedure rights. Instead, it arises from a set of institutional pressures that, in combination, differentiate criminal procedure from other forms of constitutional decision-making.

By identifying the problem of structural overdelegation, this Article clears away much of the confusion that complicates normative debates about the Supreme Court’s criminal procedure decisions. Why does the Supreme Court so frequently grant discretionary authority to law enforcement institutions that other observers find untrustworthy? How can one tell whether the Court has granted “too much” discretion to law enforcement officials, and what does that phrase even mean? By turning attention to criminal procedure’s structure, this Article offers a framework for answering these questions, and for deepening our understanding of criminal procedure decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: criminal procedure, constitutional law, legal theory, delegation, deference, institutional analysis, doctrinal entrenchment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 20, 2012 ; Last revised: August 13, 2013

Suggested Citation

O'Rourke, Anthony, Structural Overdelegation in Criminal Procedure (2013). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, 2013; SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-016. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2164556

Contact Information

Anthony O'Rourke (Contact Author)
SUNY Buffalo Law School ( email )
School of Law
528 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 561
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 175,500
Footnotes:  271

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds