|
||||
|
||||
The Relation between Equity Incentives and Misreporting: The Role of Risk-Taking IncentivesChris ArmstrongUniversity of Pennsylvania - Accounting Department David F. LarckerStanford University - Graduate School of Business Gaizka OrmazabalUniversity of Navarra, IESE Business School Daniel J. TaylorUniversity of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School November 20, 2012 Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Available online 1 March 2013, Forthcoming Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 126 Stanford Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 2120 Abstract: Prior research argues that a manager whose wealth is more sensitive to changes in the firm’s stock price has a greater incentive to misreport. However, if the manager is risk-averse and misreporting increases both equity values and equity risk, the sensitivity of the manager’s wealth to changes in stock price (portfolio delta) will have two countervailing incentive effects: a positive “reward effect” and a negative “risk effect.” In contrast, the sensitivity of the manager’s wealth to changes in risk (portfolio vega) will have an unambiguously positive incentive effect. We show that jointly considering the incentive effects of both portfolio delta and portfolio vega substantially alters inferences reported in prior literature. Using both regression and matching designs, and measuring misreporting using discretionary accruals, restatements, and SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases, we find strong evidence of a positive relation between vega and misreporting and that the incentives provided by vega subsume those of delta. Collectively, our results suggest that equity portfolios provide managers with incentives to misreport when they make managers less averse to equity risk.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61 Keywords: Equity Incentives, Executive Compensation, Misreporting, Earnings Management, Restatements, SEC Enforcement Actions JEL Classification: J33, G34, M41, M52 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 21, 2012 ; Last revised: March 20, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds