Computer Network Operations and U.S. Domestic Law: An Overview
University of Texas School of Law
October 20, 2012
89 International Law Studies 218 (2013)
U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 257
Computer Network Operations (“CNOs”) famously give rise to a number of international law complications, and scholars have duly taken note. But CNOs also raise important questions under the heading of U.S. domestic law, particularly when the government does not intend for its sponsoring role to be apparent or acknowledged. This brief essay, which builds on my prior work exploring the convergence of military and intelligence activities, introduces readers to four of the most important domestic law questions raised by CNOs. First, must Congress be notified of a given CNO, and if so, which committee should receive that notice? Second, must the CNO in question be authorized by the President himself, or can authority be moved down the chain to other officials — or perhaps even automated? Third, what is the affirmative source of domestic law authority for the executive branch to conduct various types of CNO? Fourth, and finally, does categorizing a CNO as covert action subject to Title 50 carry with it a green light (from a domestic law perspective) to violate international law?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: cyber, computer network attack, cyberattack, cyberwarfare, cyberexploitation, covert action, traditional military activities, stuxnetAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 21, 2012 ; Last revised: March 22, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds