|
||||
|
||||
Computer Network Operations and U.S. Domestic Law: An OverviewRobert ChesneyUniversity of Texas School of Law October 20, 2012 89 International Law Studies 218 (2013) U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 257 Abstract: Computer Network Operations (“CNOs”) famously give rise to a number of international law complications, and scholars have duly taken note. But CNOs also raise important questions under the heading of U.S. domestic law, particularly when the government does not intend for its sponsoring role to be apparent or acknowledged. This brief essay, which builds on my prior work exploring the convergence of military and intelligence activities, introduces readers to four of the most important domestic law questions raised by CNOs. First, must Congress be notified of a given CNO, and if so, which committee should receive that notice? Second, must the CNO in question be authorized by the President himself, or can authority be moved down the chain to other officials — or perhaps even automated? Third, what is the affirmative source of domestic law authority for the executive branch to conduct various types of CNO? Fourth, and finally, does categorizing a CNO as covert action subject to Title 50 carry with it a green light (from a domestic law perspective) to violate international law?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: cyber, computer network attack, cyberattack, cyberwarfare, cyberexploitation, covert action, traditional military activities, stuxnet Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 21, 2012 ; Last revised: March 22, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.359 seconds