Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165014
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



Oops, They Did it Again: What We Didn't Learn from U.S. v. Microsoft


Larry Downes


Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy

October 21, 2011

CPI Antitrust Chronicle, October, 2011 (2)

Abstract:     
On Aug 31, 2011, the Department of Justice, joined later by seven state attorneys general filed suit to block AT&T’s pending merger with T-Mobile USA. This article looks back at the antitrust prosecution of Microsoft to see what, if anything, regulators have learned about the dangers of intervening in dynamic, rapidly-evolving technology markets.

To be sure, the Department of Justice has never expressed any regret over the Microsoft case or any other recent antitrust action. But the decision to sue AT&T has plenty of self-interested fans, including AT&T competitors Sprint and Cellular South as well as advocacy groups in Washington who believe every merger will end the consumer internet as they know it.

Though different provisions of antitrust law apply to the two cases, both lawsuits repeat the same fatal flaws:

A. Both rely on a definition of the “relevant market” that is narrow and static.

B. Both cling to old models of economic analysis better suited for mature industrial age markets than to rapidly-evolving information markets, where new categories of products and services rise and fall in the time it takes to bring a case to appeal.

C. Both cases pursue sweeping remedies with little regard

With U.S. v. AT&T, as Yogi Berra put it so inelegantly, it’s déjà vu all over again. There is, however, one important difference. The market is shifting faster all the time. Even as consumers rush to take the next plunge, regulators are left gasping for breath, fashioning an antitrust case without the necessary ingredients.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: antitrust, AT&T, T-Mobile, Microsoft, technology industries

JEL Classification: G34, G38, K21, L12, L13, L41, L43, l63, l96, O38

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Downes, Larry, Oops, They Did it Again: What We Didn't Learn from U.S. v. Microsoft (October 21, 2011). CPI Antitrust Chronicle, October, 2011 (2). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165014

Contact Information

Larry Downes (Contact Author)
Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 193
Downloads: 18
Footnotes:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds