The Crime and Punishment of States

Gabriella Blum

Harvard Law School

October 22, 2012

Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, 2013, Forthcoming

Why is it that we don’t punish states anymore, or, at least, don’t admit to doing so?

The moral rhetoric of “crime” and “punishment” of states has been excised from mainstream international law, and replaced with an amoral rhetoric of “threat” and “prevention.” Today, individuals alone are subject to international punishment, while states are subject only to preventive, regulatory or enforcement measures.

Through a historical survey of the shift from punishment to prevention in various spheres of international law, I argue that the preference for prevention has been motivated by a strong preference for peace over justice as the ultimate goal of the international system. Driving this belief, I suggest, is an array of considerations, correlating punishment with humiliation and revenge, fearing the effects of collective punishment, doubting the operation of punishment in a decentralized structure built around the principle of sovereign equality, and bemoaning absence of an international institution to adjudicate the criminality of states. However, given existing practices under the paradigm of “prevention,” none of these considerations seems to justify a correlation between peaceful coexistence and an aversion to punishment.

Even further, the elimination of a punitive paradigm may implicate normative concerns, even accepting the preference for peace: in fact, a prevention-oriented framework may have its own distorted effects for international peace and security. Drawing on debates over preventive sanctions in U.S. domestic criminal law, I argue that even though prevention may sound like a less oppressive policy than punishment, it may in fact be far less constrained and more ruthless. At the same time, a preventive paradigm might be paralyzed from operating where there is a crime that does not immediately threaten other international actors. I demonstrate both possibilities using the contemporary debates over anticipatory self-defense and humanitarian intervention.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: international law, criminal law, punishment, prevention, war, humanitarian intervention, collective sanctions, state responsibility, peace and security, security council

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 22, 2012 ; Last revised: October 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

Blum, Gabriella, The Crime and Punishment of States (October 22, 2012). Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, 2013, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165594

Contact Information

Gabriella Blum (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,501
Downloads: 348
Download Rank: 56,581

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.516 seconds