Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165815
 
 

Footnotes (16)



 


 



De-Concentrating Poverty: De-Constructing a Theory and the Failure of Hope


Michael Diamond


Georgetown University Law Center

2012

COMMUNITY, HOME, AND IDENTITY (Michael Diamond & Terry Turnipseed, eds., Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate 2012)
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-155
Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-037

Abstract:     
Since the late 1980s, led by William Julius Wilson’s The Truly Disadvantaged, scholars have been writing about the social problems caused by the concentration in residential communities of high levels of poverty. Even before Wilson’s book, government policy, which previously had resulted in racially and economically segregated communities, had begun to shift towards de-concentration. The consent decree in Hills v Gautreaux, and the HOPE VI and Moving to Opportunity Programs all pointed towards de-concentration of poverty. Commentators have suggested both benign and not-so-benign reasons for the policy shift.

There were a variety of quite hopeful goals promoted by advocates of the policy changes. While some of the desired outcomes of these programs have been met, I argue in this paper that the programs, on the whole, have not been successful in achieving their intended purposes. Moreover, I argue that due to the destruction of existing communities the costs of these programs, particularly the HOPE VI program, far outweigh their benefits. I point out some of the benefits derived from existing communities and some of the costs of forced relocations from them.

I do not argue here for a return to policies leading to high concentration poor communities and certainly not for policies leading to dysfunctional communities. I argue instead for a policy that promotes voluntary relocation of residents in such communities with all appropriate governmental support; for a policy that results in the production of more decent and affordable units throughout the economy; and mostly for the commitment to improve existing communities so that they are places where lower income residents may live with dignity and pride.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: housing policy, low-income housing, poverty, racial discrimination, segregation, mobility programs, de-concentrating poverty, housing law

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K19

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 23, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Diamond, Michael, De-Concentrating Poverty: De-Constructing a Theory and the Failure of Hope (2012). COMMUNITY, HOME, AND IDENTITY (Michael Diamond & Terry Turnipseed, eds., Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate 2012); Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-155; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-037. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165815

Contact Information

Michael R. Diamond (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 446
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 183,890
Footnotes:  16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds