Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most

Tim Wu

Columbia University - Law School

February 14, 2012

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 78, pp. 313-328, 2012

Now is a particularly important time to consider the relationship between antitrust and innovation. Both US and European antitrust en forcement authorities are taking a look at the state of competition on the Internet, an inquiry that puts into clear focus the need for antitrust to take seriously its relationship with innovation policy.

How would the enforcement of antitrust look if the promotion of innovation were its paramount concern? I present 3 suggestions: (1) law enforcement would be primarily concerned with the exclusion of competitors. (2) A competition law centered on promoting innovation would take very seriously its oversight of "innovation catalysts." Oversight of standard setting, platforms, and patents would be of paramount importance. (3) The timing of intervention would become a more crucial issue than it is today — as a matter of prosecutorial discretion considered independent of illegality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: innovation, antitrust, internet, patents, standard setting, platforms, exclusion, competition law

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 25, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Wu, Tim, Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most (February 14, 2012). Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 78, pp. 313-328, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2166525

Contact Information

Tim Wu (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,628
Downloads: 635
Download Rank: 29,652
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds