|
||||
|
||||
Placing 'REINS' on Regulations: Assessing the Proposed REINS ActJonathan H. AdlerCase Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center October 25, 2012 16 New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 1 (2013) Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-33 Abstract: Over the past several decades, the scope, reach and cost of federal regulations have increased dramatically, prompting bipartisan calls for regulatory reform. One such proposed reform is the Regulations of the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act (REINS Act). This proposal aims to restore political accountability to federal regulatory policy decisions by requiring both Houses of Congress to approve any proposed "major rule." In effect, the REINS Act would limit the delegation of regulatory authority to federal agencies, and restore legislative control and accountability to Congress. This article seeks to assess the REINS Act and its likely effects on regulatory policy. It explains why constitutional objections to the proposal are unfounded and many policy objections overstate the REINS Act’s likely impact on the growth of federal regulation. The REINS Act is not likely to be the deregulatory blunderbuss feared by its opponents and longed for by some of its proponents. The REINS Act should be seen more as a measure to enhance accountability than to combat regulatory activity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 Keywords: REINS Act, federal regulation, agency oversight, administrative law, delegation, political accountability, delegated authority, Congressional Review Act, executive authority JEL Classification: K23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: October 27, 2012 ; Last revised: April 15, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.547 seconds