Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167371
 


 



The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary Observations on State Constitution-Making in the Nineteenth-Century West


Christian G. Fritz


University of New Mexico School of Law

1994

Rutgers Law Journal Vol. 25, No. 4, 1994

Abstract:     
This article reexamines the long-standing assumption that American constitutional history and theory is naturally understood through the lens of the Federal Constitution, with the natural consequence of the neglect of the state constitutional experience. The emphasis on the Federal Constitution stems from a belief that it represents the most authentic source, and the most meaningful expression, of written constitutions in America. That conclusion -- with its concomitant justification for neglecting state constitution-making -- follows from three interrelated but highly questionable assumptions. The first is that the Federal Constitution is the paradigm of written constitutions. The second is that state constitution-making has largely been an uncreative, unthinking process of borrowing constitutional provisions from the Federal Constitution and other states. The third assumption is that the critical thinking about constitutions initiated by the American Revolution culminated in the formation of the Federal Constitution. Collectively, these three assumptions have made the Federal Constitution the standard against which all other constitutions are measured, and have dismissed nineteenth-century state constitution making as largely irrelevant to an American constitutional tradition.

This Article first examines how these three assumptions arise and then challenges their validity in the context of nineteenth-century constitution-making in the American West. The reported debates from nineteenth-century constitutional conventions in the American West reveal much about how delegates approached and performed their duties as constitution-makers as well as the delegates' struggles with the theoretical underpinnings of republican governments. From their perspective, the unquestioned assumptions associated with the present-day emphasis on the Federal Constitution move to the background and the tradition of state constitution-making takes its proper place in the foreground of the American constitutional tradition.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: American Constitutional History and Theory, Constitutionalism, State Constitutions, Federal Constitution, American Constitutional Tradition, Constitution-Making, Constitutional Revision, State Constitution-Making, Written Constitutions, Nineteenth Century American West, Constitutional Convention Deb

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 26, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Fritz, Christian G., The American Constitutional Tradition Revisited: Preliminary Observations on State Constitution-Making in the Nineteenth-Century West (1994). Rutgers Law Journal Vol. 25, No. 4, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167371

Contact Information

Christian G. Fritz (Contact Author)
University of New Mexico School of Law ( email )
1117 Stanford, N.E.
MSC11 6070
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 261
Downloads: 28

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds