Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167417
 
 

Footnotes (52)



 


 



Unenforceability


Lee Petherbridge


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Jason Rantanen


University of Iowa - College of Law

R. Polk Wagner


University of Pennsylvania Law School

February 22, 2012

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-28
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-15
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-10
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-28
7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies

Abstract:     
The patent doctrine of inequitable conduct — which allows a patent to be held unenforceable on the basis of misbehavior by the applicant during patent prosecution — has been the subject of intense criticism from the bench and bar alike. And yet to date there has been no systematic attempt to determine whether the doctrine is or is not working as theorized. This study fills that gap. We evaluate the performance of the inequitable conduct doctrine with a novel methodological approach: by empirically characterizing the differences between patents found unenforceable and several other types of patents (unlitigated, litigated, invalid, obvious, and under-disclosed), we use those differences to reveal the real-world impact of the inequitable conduct doctrine. We find that patents held unenforceable have clear hallmarks of risky prosecution behavior, such as longer pendency and fewer disclosures of prior art as compared to all other types we studied. These results indicate that the doctrine is likely to be operating better than the conventional wisdom would suggest.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: patents, unenforceability, inequitable conduct, empirical, patent data

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 27, 2012 ; Last revised: February 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Petherbridge, Lee and Rantanen, Jason and Wagner, R. Polk, Unenforceability (February 22, 2012). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-28; U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-15; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-10; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-28; 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167417 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2167417

Contact Information

Lee Petherbridge
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8194 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)
Jason Rantanen
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
R. Polk Wagner (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
267-433-4431 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,450
Downloads: 921
Download Rank: 12,501
Footnotes:  52
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.610 seconds