Voice versus Exit in Health Care Policy
M. Todd Henderson
University of Chicago - Law School
Pathology Case Reviews, Vol. 17, No. 4, July/August 2012
University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 613
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 402
This essay uses the recent controversy over President Obama’s mandate that insurance companies provide generous birth control coverage to explore larger issues about the optimal locus of health care decision making. Mandates may be justified in some instances, but they sacrifice choice and local variation and perhaps lead to worse social outcomes. The key question for policy makers is whether market processes or rule by expert is more likely to strike the right balance of choice and mandate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 9
Keywords: law and economics, federalism, health care policy, birth controlAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 27, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds