The Problem of Epistemic Cost: Why Do Economists Not Change their Minds (About the ‘Coase Theorem’)?
American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 72, No. 5, 2013
Errors in the history of economic analysis often remain uncorrected for long periods due to positive epistemic costs (PEC) involved in allocating time to going back over what older generations wrote. In order to demonstrate this in a case study, the economists’ practice of the 'Coase Theorem' is reconsidered from a PEC point of view.
Keywords: epistemic costs, intellectual path dependence, ideologization, the 'Coase Theorem,' 'The Problem of Social Cost' (1960)
JEL Classification: B25, B41, B52Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 29, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds