Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167883
 


 



Justifying Fiduciary Remedies


Paul B. Miller


McGill University Faculty of Law

October 28, 2012

University of Toronto Law Journal, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Fiduciary remedies are notoriously potent. Fiduciaries who profit from their disloyalty are liable to be ordered to disgorge all of their gains. It is widely understood that disgorgement deters disloyalty by threatening removal of gains, the prospect of which might incentivize wrongdoing. However, disgorgement may be ordered even where fiduciaries act for the primary purpose of benefitting their beneficiaries and succeed on that score. This naturally raises questions concerning the justification for the remedy.

A common assumption in the literature is that the justification for disgorgement – whatever it might be – must be exceptional by virtue of being inconsistent with formal corrective justice. Formal corrective justice asserts that remedies rectify wrongs and are properly understood as sharing in the justification for primary rights. Disgorgement seems inconsistent with formal corrective justice, because it appears responsive to public interest considerations having nothing to do with the primary right to loyalty.

This article challenges the exceptionalism thesis. It reviews arguments that endorse the thesis and, finding none satisfactory, it offers an alternative that explains how disgorgement for disloyalty effectuates formal corrective justice. It does so by restoring gains to beneficiaries to which they are entitled as a matter of primary right, by virtue of their exclusive claim over fiduciary power as a means derived from their own legal personalities or those of their benefactors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Keywords: Philosophy of Private Law, Private Law Theory, Corrective Justice, Fiduciary Law, Fiduciary Duties, Fiduciary Remedies, Disgorgement

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K11, K12, K13, K20, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Miller, Paul B., Justifying Fiduciary Remedies (October 28, 2012). University of Toronto Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2167883

Contact Information

Paul Baron Miller (Contact Author)
McGill University Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 777
Downloads: 197
Download Rank: 85,422

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.547 seconds