The Punishment Jurist
Marc O. DeGirolami
St. John's University School of Law
October 29, 2012
Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, Markus Dubber, ed., Oxford University Press (Forthcoming)
St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-0023
This is an essay on the critical history of the thought of the Victorian-era judge, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen. It discusses some of the themes in his major work, "The History of the Criminal Law of England." And it reflects on a cluster of questions involving criminal punishment: whether Stephen had a "theory" of punishment; if not how best to characterize his thought; and whether his views and understanding of the aims and functions of punishment remain relevant. The essay explores Stephen's positive and critical contributions, and it concludes that Stephen's major insight was methodological. His view is that the reasons for punishment cannot be separated from the obligations and the nature of the judicial office. He was neither a punishment retributivist nor a punishment consequentialist, but a punishment jurist.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: crime, punishment, history, theory, judiciaryAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 30, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.715 seconds