Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168363
 
 

Footnotes (140)



 


 



Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): The (Only) Means for Distinguishing Knowledge of Medical Causation From Expert Opinion in the Courtroom


Terence M. Davidson


University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - School of Medicine

Christopher P. Guzelian


Thomas Jefferson School of Law

October 30, 2012

Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 741, 2012
Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2168363

Abstract:     
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) was first established in the 1980s when physicians and medical educators purposed to more uniformly apply standards of evidence gained from the scientific method to assess questions of medical causation. Now widely employed by physicians in medical decision making and during their selections of medical treatment, and nearly omnipresent in modern medical student education, EBM allows doctors to separate scientific facts from opinions in determining clinical treatment efficacy. Accordingly, EBM — whether in a hospital or in a courtroom — is the systematic method capable of distinguishing expert pronouncements about medical or scientific questions of causation as either (1) authority-based opinions (derived from expert intuition or reasoning, principles of pathophysiology, or inference based on experimental or observational data of insufficient quality) or (2) evidence-based conclusions (objective knowledge arising from the availability of sufficient, high-quality evidence).

This article recommends that EBM should supplement ineffective legal gatekeeper rules of scientific evidence and be incorporated into the courtroom to (1) accurately distinguish medical knowledge from mere expert opinion and (2) thereby assist the court in correctly adjudicating disputed medical matters and toxic industrial or environmental exposure cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Evidence-Based Medicine, EBM, scientific evidence, medical malpractice, environmental

JEL Classification: K13, K32, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 30, 2012 ; Last revised: October 9, 2013

Suggested Citation

Davidson, Terence M. and Guzelian, Christopher P., Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): The (Only) Means for Distinguishing Knowledge of Medical Causation From Expert Opinion in the Courtroom (October 30, 2012). Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 741, 2012; Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2168363. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168363

Contact Information

Terence M. Davidson
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - School of Medicine ( email )
9500 Gilman Drive
MC 0507
La Jolla, CA 92093
United States
Christopher P. Guzelian (Contact Author)
Thomas Jefferson School of Law ( email )
1155 Island Ave
San Diego, CA 92101
United States
619-961-4248 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 364
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 185,186
Footnotes:  140

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds