Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168386
 
 

Footnotes (24)



 


 



Retributivism: The Right and the Good


Adil Ahmad Haque


Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - School of Law-Newark

September 10, 2012

Law and Philosophy, Vol. 31, 2012
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper

Abstract:     
Victor Tadros claims that punishment must be justified either instrumentally or on the grounds that deserved punishment is intrinsically good. However, if we have deontic reasons to punish wrongdoers then these reasons could justify punishment non-instrumentally. Morever, even if the punishment of wrongdoers is intrinsically good this fact cannot contribute to the justication of punishment because goodness is not a reason-giving property. It follows that retributivism is both true and important only if we have deontic reasons to punish.

Tadros also claims that the constitutive aim of punishment is to inflict harm or suffering on offenders. On the contrary, the constitutive aim of retributive punishment is to inflict (justified) wrongs on offenders that are proportionate to the (unjustified) wrongs they commit. Indeed, punishment should involve the least harmful wrong that is proportionate to the wrongfulness of the offense, adequate to facilitate recognition, and (perhaps) conducive to deterrence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: retributivism, desert, deontic, evaluative, reasons, right, good, punishment, capital, corporal, Victor Tadros, Derek Parfit, T.M. Scanlon, proportion

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 30, 2012 ; Last revised: August 13, 2013

Suggested Citation

Haque, Adil Ahmad, Retributivism: The Right and the Good (September 10, 2012). Law and Philosophy, Vol. 31, 2012; Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168386

Contact Information

Adil Ahmad Haque (Contact Author)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - School of Law-Newark ( email )
123 Washington Street
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 493
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 176,708
Footnotes:  24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.516 seconds