Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168556
 


 



Why International Catch Shares Won't Save Ocean Biodiversity


Holly Doremus


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

October 29, 2012

Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, Forthcoming
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2168556

Abstract:     
Skepticism about the efficacy and efficiency of regulatory approaches has produced a wave of enthusiasm for market-based strategies for dealing with environmental conflicts. In the fisheries context, the most prominent of these strategies is the use of 'catch shares,' which assign specific proportions of the total allowable catch to individuals who are then free to trade them with others. Catch shares are now in wide use domestically within many nations, and there are increasing calls for implementation of internationally tradable catch shares. Based on a review of theory, empirical evidence, and two contexts in which catch shares have been proposed, this paper explains why international catch shares are not likely to arrest the decline of ocean biodiversity. Catch shares were developed to promote greater economic efficiency and profitability in the fishing industry. They have proven capable of doing so at the domestic level, although their effects on wealth distribution have frequently been controversial. Theoretical and empirical support for the proposition that catch shares promote conservation, especially of non-target resources, is thinner. Furthermore, in the international context catch shares face special challenges. Catch shares cannot resolve the value differences that underlie the most intractable disagreements about international fisheries management. They are less likely to reduce conflicts over total allowable catch in the international than in the domestic context, because distrust of managers and competitors runs deeper. Finally, catch share strategies require effective enforcement, which is both institutionally and practically difficult to provide for many international fisheries. In general, catch shares are not a promising route to improving international fisheries management, and pursuing them could distract the international community from more important steps toward improving conservation of global ocean resources.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: fisheries management, catch shares, biodiversity protection, tradable permits, international law, natural resource management, ocean law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 31, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Doremus, Holly, Why International Catch Shares Won't Save Ocean Biodiversity (October 29, 2012). Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, Forthcoming; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2168556. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2168556

Contact Information

Holly Doremus (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
790 Simon Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-643-5699 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 287
Downloads: 68
Download Rank: 199,073

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.688 seconds