Roe's Ragged Remnant: Viability
Mark William Osler
University of St. Thomas - School of Law (Minnesota)
Stanford Law & Policy Review, 2013, Forthcoming
U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-35
In "Roe's Ragged Fringe," the consequences of one odd choice made in Roe v. Wade are explored. In Roe, the majority chose viability as the threshold at which the state's interest in the fetus became significant enough to allow abortion to be barred. However, it chose a different threshold, birth, as the point at which the unborn child itself gained any rights. This article assails the illogic of choosing two points in time to describe the same essential event. At the very least, personhood rights should attach to the unborn child at viability, as at that point the pregnancy can be terminated without an abortion -- through a live birth. The essential trade-off changes from being between freedom of the mother versus the life of the child, to the cost of the premature birth versus the life of the child; a very different calculus. This article urges that this oddity be corrected, and viability be seen as a crucial threshold not only for the interests of the state, but the interests of the child.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: constitutional law, Roe v. Wade, abortion, reproductive rights, Right to LifeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 30, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds