Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170148
 
 

Footnotes (157)



 


 



Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker


Sonja B. Starr


University of Michigan Law School

M. Marit Rehavi


University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research

November 1, 2012

U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-021

Abstract:     
Current empirical estimates of racial and other unwarranted disparities in sentencing suffer from two pervasive flaws. The first is a focus on the sentencing stage in isolation. Studies control for the “presumptive sentence” or closely related measures that are themselves the product of discretionary charging, plea-bargaining, and fact-finding processes. Any disparities in these earlier processes are built into the control variable, which leads to misleading sentencing-disparity estimates. The second problem is specific to studies of sentencing reforms: they use loose methods of causal inference that do not disentangle the effects of reform from surrounding events and trends.

This Article explains these problems and presents an analysis that corrects them and reaches very different results from the existing literature. We address the first problem by using a dataset that traces cases from arrest to sentencing and by examining disparities across all post-arrest stages. We find that most of the otherwise-unexplained racial disparities in sentencing can be explained by prosecutors’ choices to bring mandatory minimum charges. We address the problem of disentangling trends using a rigorous method called regression discontinuity design. We apply it to assess the effects of the loosening of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Booker. Contrary to prominent recent studies, we find that Booker did not increase disparity, and may have reduced it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: sentencing. racial disparity, mandatory minimums, United States v. Booker

JEL Classification: K14, K42

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2012 ; Last revised: November 11, 2012

Suggested Citation

Starr, Sonja B. and Rehavi, M. Marit, Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker (November 1, 2012). U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-021. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170148 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170148

Contact Information

Sonja B. Starr (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State St
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
United States
617 821-1222 (Phone)
M. Marit Rehavi
University of British Columbia ( email )
997-1873 East Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1
Canada
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1400
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,281
Downloads: 234
Download Rank: 76,956
Footnotes:  157

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds