Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170578
 


 



The Trouble with City of Boerne, and Why It Matters for the Voting Rights Act As Well


Evan Tsen Lee


University of California Hastings College of the Law

November 2, 2012


Abstract:     
The Supreme Court's test for the constitutionality of state action and its test for the constitutionality of congressional legislation enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment are out of synch with one another. When a plaintiff challenges state action under the Fourteenth Amendment, the degree of scrutiny varies with the type of claim. Racial classifications, for example, are examined under "strict" scrutiny. Most classifications, such as disability, age, or socioeconomic status, are examined on a "rational basis." When Congress acts pursuant to its Section 5 powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to protect rights, however, the Court has no corresponding spectrum of degrees of scrutiny. In this paper I argue that the Court should adopt the "mirror image" spectrum of scrutiny for congressional enactments pursuant to its Section 5 powers. For example, if Congress seeks to protect people from age discrimination or discrimination based on disability by permitting individuals to sue states without their consent in federal court, the plaintiff should have to show that he or she actually suffered a constitutional violation in the case at bar. If Congress seeks to protect people from race discrimination, the plaintiff should have to show only that there is a rational, "means-end" relationship between the congressional remedy and the targeted discrimination. Applying this test to the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits race discrimination in voting, the courts should apply rational, "means-end" scrutiny to statutes such as the Voting Rights Act, including the preclearance condition that is likely to come before the Supreme Court in the near future.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Section 5, congruence and proportionality, strict scrutiny, rational basis review, Voting Rights Act, preclearance

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2012 ; Last revised: November 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Lee, Evan Tsen, The Trouble with City of Boerne, and Why It Matters for the Voting Rights Act As Well (November 2, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170578 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170578

Contact Information

Evan Tsen Lee (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 341
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 217,364

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds