Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170668
 


 



Lautsi v. Italy: Coercion and Lack of Neutrality in the Classroom?


Sylvie Langlaude


Queen's University Belfast - School of Law

2012

(2012-2013) 6 Annuaire Droit et Religions 601-617

Abstract:     
On 18 March 2011, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights delivered its much awaited judgment in Lautsi and Others v Italy. The case revolved around the presence of crucifixes on the walls of classrooms in state schools. The Grand Chamber, in overturning the Chamber judgment, found that there was no breach of parental rights in education under Article 2 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention. The state did not have a duty to maintain neutrality in schools and it had a wide margin of appreciation in deciding on the place of religious symbols in schools. This commentary focuses on the Grand Chamber’s reasoning, compares it with the Chamber’s judgment, draws examples from other jurisdictions and considers the potential implications of the Chamber judgment being upheld by the Grand Chamber.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2012 ; Last revised: November 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Langlaude, Sylvie, Lautsi v. Italy: Coercion and Lack of Neutrality in the Classroom? (2012). (2012-2013) 6 Annuaire Droit et Religions 601-617. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2170668

Contact Information

Sylvie Langlaude (Contact Author)
Queen's University Belfast - School of Law ( email )
School of Law
Belfast BT7 1NN, BT7 1NN
Ireland
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 288
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 198,476

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.360 seconds